It does not seem at all reasonable that, once the author is dead, under the justification of protecting the “rights” of his heirs, his work should remain almost inaccessible for seventy years, until it finally falls into the so-called public domain. Certainly, it does not seem to be in the author’s interest for his work to be subject to the whims of those who see it only as a means of earning a few bucks, and who almost always cause it to fall into oblivion just when it could gain greater repercussion, that is, in the years immediately following his death. Repeatedly, what we see are “heirs” opting for the best deal, that is, giving exclusivity to a mediocre publisher to print the works on cheap paper, with poor editing and higher profits. However, it is not uncommon for the publisher to also hinder distribution, which results in fewer sales and lower profits. All of this is very petty, and it is incomprehensible how it became normal, especially for the “heirs,” to use the author instead of honoring him, to harm him instead of promoting him…