Tag: literature

Says Lavelle:

Le premier devoir de l’écrivain doit être de s’élever assez au-dessus de toutes les circonstances de sa vie particulière pour fournir à tous les êtres un appui de tous les instants et les montrer à eux-mêmes tels qu’ils voudraient être toujours.

This duty is perhaps the most difficult, because “rising above all circumstances” involves first understanding them, and understanding how they perhaps fit into the bigger picture of individual existence, and only then, having extracted a crystal-clear meaning from them, is to think about how this meaning can be transplanted to the general human experience. And communicate it! In fact, there is no human experience, no matter how individual, whose meaning cannot be extracted in different circumstances; what is difficult, however, is to see the big in the small, something we have grown unaccustomed to doing.

As Lavelle rightly pointed out, the best books do not reveal something unknown to us, but something we already know intimately and which, due to a sudden illumination, we seem to discover. The best books, then, only shed light on something hidden inside us. The curious thing about this is that the sensation of discovering something we already know makes a very strong impression on our minds, much greater than learning something really new and unknown. And at the same time as we immediately identify with the idea, we also immediately establish a point of contact with the author.

The author who, for example, says something already said by one author, and then says something already said by another, has produced something new: creating a new unity, can already be considered original. It is the same with style, which is almost always a kind of blend, a kind of personal concatenation of different traits learned from different sources which, together, acquire an unprecedented unity. Just as one does not create from nothing, what one creates only consciously dispenses the quality of creation.