The Illusion of Poetic Freedom

The evolution of poetry over the centuries gives us a false illusion of freedom gained, it seems to us that, over the centuries, the poets have been gradually getting rid of the ties of the verses until reaching the free verse.  In part, the poets proved themselves capable of breaking old conventions, introducing new expressive resources (the enjambement, for example) and expanding the aesthetic possibilities of poetry. But it is false to think that, sitting down to compose, the poet feels free as to form, even in free verse. That, of course, if he is a good poet. But why? Because even if he gives up the metrics, the rhymes, varies the stanzas and extrapolates the limits of the verse, the poet will be bound by the rhythm. If he wants to compose a good poem, he is not free to put the words where he wants. Rhythm, the balance between tonic and tense syllables, cadenced movement of sounds: the day the poem that ignores these principles is considered good, we will all be—from illiterate to philistines—great poets.

____________

Read more:

The Problem of Originality

Interesting how the duty of originality haunts the average writer. I mean, before he can express himself with sincerity and strength, he has to be original. But originality, unless the writer deliberately uses a ready-made formula, plagiarizes and refuses to think independently, comes naturally. First, because the psychological interpretations of the facts, the relationship locked between the individual and the surrounding reality are variable and almost unique. Second, because biographies are absolutely individual, that is: each writer has unique experiences to be transmitted to his art. So unless he intends to be someone other than himself, any half dozen sincere lines will make the writer always look original.

____________

Read more:

Spreadsheets, Spreadsheets…

It amazes me that the world has existed for so long without control spreadsheets. Sometimes I refuse to believe it, but backwards from the 1980s — at least — people lived without spreadsheets. My brain locks up: how? Impossible! And I convince myself that by deleting my spreadsheets, my home would immediately catch fire. There is no routine task that does not require a spreadsheet: from shopping at the supermarket to accompanying readings. Controlling the weight, the level of body fat is very important. The movies watched, the monthly cash flow, the portfolio of assets, the hours in language study, the special alcoholic beverages consumed over the years, the planning of daily physical exercises… all these are mandatory spreadsheets, essential to life. There are others, several others. And I am amazed at this: how to write a book without a spreadsheet? If I was to prepare a guide detailing the writing process, the first and obligatory step would be: create a companion spreadsheet, list the planning of the chapters, define their average length, and only then think about what to write. I would even say that, in many cases, the spreadsheet is previous to the idea or, still, the idea is only possible with the spreadsheet. Strange world…

____________

Read more:

The “Masterpieces of Genre Fiction”

Someone asks me what I think of the “masterpieces of genre fiction”. Strange question. I have never considered masterpieces from such a perspective. I mean: a masterpiece is so — or not — independent of its literary genre. But the question opens the door to an interesting reflection. What has been conventionally called “genre fiction” does not seem to have won the respect of critics. But criticism is usually unfair with everything new. Literature, however, is always on the move — and worse for the critics who do not follow it. On the other hand, the popularization of “genre fiction” owes much to the fact that these works, in general, are written with the reader in mind. Writing with the reader in mind is an extremely effective method of producing poor work. But how garbage has always been successful among the public! Therefore, as far as “genre fiction” is concerned, caution is needed. Under no circumstances does a literary genre impose limits on the quality of an artistic work, so several works of “genre fiction” will overcome the barrier of time and become classics — some, in fact, have already done so… However, the artists of this literary genre will walk for a long time on a narrow line: loved by the public, despised by the critics, having to deal with the tyranny of success that can, in fact, destroy their artistic quality. It is necessary to have the courage to place art as queen and to be indifferent to the public’s desires…

____________

Read more: