Here I am thinking: the day has come when rhythm, after being used for so long in poetry, is no longer beautiful; and beautiful is to make poetry without rhythm. Curiously, I am assaulted by a very funny memory. Once, I went to the border with Paraguay and was there to watch the most renowned “cultural spectacle” in the region. This spectacle was nothing more than an attempt to showcase the musical traditions of the neighboring countries. It was a presentation, although very expensive, roundly ridiculous; but there was one moment that, by its unthinkable grotesqueness, made the ticket price worthwhile. On stage, a guy in Paraguayan-themed robes came up carrying a harp. A harp: the most imposing of musical instruments. There was a silence, or rather, the silence of the very imposing instrument froze the audience. Obviously, they were expecting the man to play the harp. However, after hitting exactly two notes, the man, at the sound of a playback, takes the harp as a lady and begins to dance: he twirls, swings it from side to side, and dares to throw it up in the air. At this moment, the audience was already clapping their hands in excitement. It is true that I could not control my laughter, which was lost between the clapping and the playback. But there was the harp, huge, with its something divine, beautiful as if it were made of gold, whirling in the hands of a clown to the applause of a few dozen imbeciles.
Tag: literature
Always Unpleasant…
It is curious how the writing process always seems unpleasant, or at the very least, overexposes its worst aspects. We start a prose piece, and our mind remembers how much more beautiful poetry is; we draft a volume of verse, and our mind seems to miss the productivity of prose. There is no escape: whatever we create, the process will always be a struggle, and abandoning it will always be easier. That’s why it makes us envious when we observe those who play around making art or make it thinking of figures, of fame, of readers. Although they produce mediocre works, they free themselves from this unbearable anguish and this terrible desire for annihilation.
Freedom in Discipline
Auguste Dorchain, in L’art des vers, admirably defined the charm provided by poetry: “la surprise dans la sécurité”, “la variété dans l’unité”, “la liberté dans la discipline”. It is the balance between such contrasts that gives us a sense of pleasure in going through a poetic work. Without the security, the unity, the discipline, we do not find the whole harmonious; without the surprise, the variety, the freedom, it does not seem stimulating. Thus, it is fair that a poet defines which elements will represent the first qualities, and which the second in his poem. It is by balancing them that a well-made whole is built, even if it leans more toward the most desired effect. While the yearning for freedom that inspired poets of the past is understandable, while many innovations have renewed and enhanced admirably the poetic art, it seems a depreciation of art to accept it performed in any way, as if the music of a layman playing a musical instrument in disorderly fashion were rewarded with praise.
Regularity and Dynamism
We jump from English to Portuguese poetic theory and observe a contrast. In English, rhythmic regularity is valued, when it seems Portuguese theorists agree that variety gives dynamism to poems and is, therefore, preferable to avoid “monotony”. The curious thing is that the latter do not suspect that there is no rhythm without regularity and end up fatally praising the rhythm of poems that do not have it. Any sentence spoken in any language will have an intonation, or a “cadence” of its own when analyzed individually. Poetry, however, arranges phrases in such a way that there is a harmonious link between them, a link determined by rhythm. If, from one verse to the next, everything changes, there can be no rhythm in the composition, unless one makes a creative and non-musical use of this word.