Tag: literature

Good literature always has an instructive character, even if it is veiled, which allows the reader to grow through reading. That is why it is good for the writer to ask how much a hypothetical reader would gain from reading what he intends to write: depending on the answer, perhaps it would be better to look for other ideas, more convincing, more realistic, less selfish and more individual. Because this is exactly what becomes evident when this exercise is practiced: the best ideas, the ones that will most easily add something to the reader’s experience, are those that are more particular, those that are more intensely lived and more deeply assimilated. In short: one can only teach well what one knows well.

Literature is a hard occupation because, in general, its results are not tangible. That is why, in the face of a “practical occupation”, it seems entirely pointless. And even if that is not the case, that is how it seems to the writer who works at it every day, in otherwords, the routine of invisible creation gives rise to a feeling of uselessness that is difficult to master, a feeling that is made much worse by the palpable reality that the newly created work has no effect on anyone, stimulates anyone, and is often not even noticed by anyone. But here lies the brilliant paradox: the more useless literature seems, the more authentic it is. And the great writer completes himself by overcoming appearances and leaving his example of overcoming them as a legacy.

We sometimes see in a man who is experienced in literature the unusual ability to distance himself from himself in order to analyze himself, in other words, to see himself in third person, imagining himself as a character in a novel, not idealizing his own life, but seeing himself as someone who decides and reaps the rewards of his own decisions. If he wants to idealize his own life too, then he will be able to measure how close or far he is from what he intends to be. In both cases, above all, he gets to know himself on a level that, without in-depth knowledge of the dynamics of biographies, is very difficult to achieve.

A multitude of examples show that if the author is sincere and true to his experience, true to his artistic motivation, the work he creates never fits into any model. It comes out, of course, with traces that more or less show his influences, but it also comes loaded with an ambiguity, a uniqueness that is quite special. Even if he fails to express himself, even if he lacks the verve to realize what he has planned, the work will always have that sincerity at its heart without which lasting art cannot be made. And that is the most important.