There is no more thankless task than to teach someone who does not want to learn. Learning has to start from a desire, motivated in turn by the awareness of a need. Otherwise, the teacher and the student are frustrated. All teaching should be seen as an act of generosity and, consequently, as a stimulus to gratitude. Then we would have a teacher satisfied with the work and a student aware of the importance of education. In the future, the student could find in the teaching itself the repayment of the debt he had incurred, or, in other words, teach to express gratitude. On this cycle all true education depends, and from it we note that education is fundamentally a moral problem.
Tag: philosophy
Although Simplifications Such as Manichaeism…
Although simplifications such as Manichaeism are criticized, the practical world allows, and sometimes requires such simplifications. When good faith and bad faith confront each other, it is fundamental, first of all, to denounce them. Thus, when one notices that most ideological disputes boil down to that primary confrontation, one must throw ideologies aside and stick to what is most important of all; otherwise, one enters the cunning game of bad faith.
Virtue Is Simple and Vice Complex
Certainly it has already been noted that virtue is simple and vice complex. Virtue does not disguise itself, and almost always presents itself as banal, boring, dull, which often misleads about its nature. Vice, on the other hand, is difficult for us to see right away as vice: compared to virtue, it has a more charming, more instigating presentation. Virtue is simple because, to justify it, one never needs more than a handful of words or immediate common sense; vice, on the other hand, makes use of more sophisticated possibilities of argument, and its dialectic convinces precisely because of its sophistication. Reflection on such qualities seems to suggest a dualism between form and content—and the conclusions we draw show, unwillingly, which one we value more.
It Is Beneficial for the Moralist…
To a certain extent, it is beneficial for the moralist to be able to identify falsehood from afar, so that an inflection or a glance is enough to reveal a character. Pragmatically, this ability will be of use to him throughout his life. There is, however, an inevitable side-effect: realizing its near omnipresence, he must either tolerate it or turn away. If he has learned to detest it, if he has taken an invincible repulsion to it, he will fall into that rare practice which is now called a personality disorder, and even if, for whatever reason, he ends up giving in to the torture which his contact with the world will become, it is only in that that he will find his peace.