Psychological disturbance and open warfare against the instinctive manifestations of the mind are the primary and fundamental steps in achieving any moral or spiritual advancement. Therefore anguish, an inevitable side effect, is a common trait among noble natures. Subsequent steps vary from Buddha to Tolstoy, from Schopenhauer to Nietzsche—but evolution is impossible for a spirit that has never experienced the discomfort of existing.
Tag: philosophy
The Pages of Jakob Boehme
It is a real shock to come into contact with the pages of Jakob Boehme. The first impulse is to ask: how is this possible? The mystical universe that permeates his lines seems unthinkable, inconceivable, imperceptible to the average human being. Where does such ingenious imagination come from? Whence is this conception of life that brings the banality of the concrete to its knees, making what the eyes can see ridiculous? The notion of the ultimate meaning, the vision of paths, the philosophy that implies a conduct… all these manifestations of a luminous and respectable spirit, of which I refuse to make a value judgment. But what is most astonishing, what paralyzes the mind and throws the brain into perplexity, is to be aware, at every page, that the author of the lines was a shoemaker!
If There Really Is a Hell in Which Hypocrites Suffer…
If there really is a hell in which hypocrites suffer, let modern society know where it will unleash its word and implement its conventions. Hypocrisy is the substance of this so-called marketing age and is ingrained in the very core of its foundation. Without hypocrisy, there are no social relations anymore: it is by it that modern man displays his intelligence and good manners. “Age of marketing”, and hypocrisy is a beautiful definition of marketing. The world would be more honest if the good worker would say, “I work with hypocrisy management”. But of course he never will. The good worker cannot even be honest with his fellow workers, with his neighbors, with his friends, with his family… Can hell hold so many people? On the other hand, there are two paths for the modern non-hypocrite: (1) operate a total annihilation of social relations or (2) live normally, under the penalty of being widely hated in all circles, if not unemployed or beggar. Outside of this is history…
The Obsession With Reasoning From Every Possible Angle Is the Death…
The obsession with reasoning from every possible angle is the death of reasoning: there are no limits to thought, the points of view are never exhausted. This is why any treatise or system that claims to be complete is doomed to failure from the start. Broad reasoning requires the confrontation of opposing propositions and invariably cancels them out one by one when approached with impartiality. If broadens the work, it broadens by annihilating itself and showing itself to be increasingly flawed. For every valid reasoning there is an equally valid contrary reasoning. If the thinker opts for comprehensiveness, he must necessarily give up assertiveness—and, consequently, potency.