The Irony of Rational Thought Is That It Tacitly Demands a Conclusion

The irony of rational thought is that it tacitly demands a conclusion. Otherwise, it is to declare itself useless, to conclude that it has not advanced. And the conclusion is precisely the impossible, the false step and the defeat! By concluding, one loses the game, one buries beforehand future possibilities, one declares the end of mental activity. From this we extract: if one is to fail and give up, let one fail and give up late, only when faced with the presentiment of failure and if seized by an irresistible impulse. Schopenhauer, a brilliant mind, did himself harm by doing this too early: he would have had more peaceful days had he not walked, for almost all of his adult life, carrying the weight of his conclusions.

The Discomfort of Existing

Psychological disturbance and open warfare against the instinctive manifestations of the mind are the primary and fundamental steps in achieving any moral or spiritual advancement. Therefore anguish, an inevitable side effect, is a common trait among noble natures. Subsequent steps vary from Buddha to Tolstoy, from Schopenhauer to Nietzsche—but evolution is impossible for a spirit that has never experienced the discomfort of existing.

The Pages of Jakob Boehme

It is a real shock to come into contact with the pages of Jakob Boehme. The first impulse is to ask: how is this possible? The mystical universe that permeates his lines seems unthinkable, inconceivable, imperceptible to the average human being. Where does such ingenious imagination come from? Whence is this conception of life that brings the banality of the concrete to its knees, making what the eyes can see ridiculous? The notion of the ultimate meaning, the vision of paths, the philosophy that implies a conduct… all these manifestations of a luminous and respectable spirit, of which I refuse to make a value judgment. But what is most astonishing, what paralyzes the mind and throws the brain into perplexity, is to be aware, at every page, that the author of the lines was a shoemaker!

If There Really Is a Hell in Which Hypocrites Suffer…

If there really is a hell in which hypocrites suffer, let modern society know where it will unleash its word and implement its conventions. Hypocrisy is the substance of this so-called marketing age and is ingrained in the very core of its foundation. Without hypocrisy, there are no social relations anymore: it is by it that modern man displays his intelligence and good manners. “Age of marketing”, and hypocrisy is a beautiful definition of marketing. The world would be more honest if the good worker would say, “I work with hypocrisy management”. But of course he never will. The good worker cannot even be honest with his fellow workers, with his neighbors, with his friends, with his family… Can hell hold so many people? On the other hand, there are two paths for the modern non-hypocrite: (1) operate a total annihilation of social relations or (2) live normally, under the penalty of being widely hated in all circles, if not unemployed or beggar. Outside of this is history…