Tag: literature

Three months without composing a single, solitary verse. My mind boiling like never before. As an excuse, the other jobs and the stupid imperative of necessity. On more than one occasion, the feeling of a near explosion, the call of the mind to record in art the powerful and terrible judgment, the cry in verse form. And, alas, the silence, the rational inaction to let the impulse slow down. Indeed, it does slow down—and fate has another chance. In vain, however, for it will surely return…

First contact with the work of Paul Valéry. The style is striking, in verse and prose. Scouring his biography, I find the aggression: his Cahiers sums up to two hundred and fifty-seven volumes in which, day after day, for fifty-one years, Valéry built his monument of thirty thousand pages. Thirty thousand pages! Carpeaux’s words, “The lofty Paul Valéry is one of the most brilliant prose writers of the French language.” — “There are those who prefer Valéry’s prose to his poetry. There are those who consider Valéry a greater artist than poet. As a wit in prose and as an artist in verse, there is no one in this century who can compare to him.” Words that make us think…

Here I am, as a professional joke writer, letting my essentially analytical spirit take me and dissecting the elements of quality humor. I think of Voltaire. The irony, if well applied, does not lead to laughter but delivers lasting satisfaction, sustainable over a long interval. In Voltaire’s case, the effects of irony come out as secondary to a philosophical posture that dictates the tone of his work. But let’s get back to the jokes: absurdity and exaggeration seem to me to be the fundamental elements of the best ones, and surprise as the essential result. Here, the laughter. Voltaire himself provides a good example: it is impossible not to remember the unforgettable Anabaptist Jacques, described as “bon“, “honnête” and “charitable” for several pages in Candide, whose appearance always tries to evoke good feelings and who, suddenly, when asking a sailor for help in the middle of a storm, is brutally thrown into the sea by the stranger. The exaggeration of the violence, the absurdity of the cruel, sudden, and unjustifiable act bring, of course, full laughter, but not for the mere exaggeration or absurdity, but for the naturalness with which both are presented. In this detail, it seems to me, lies the secret of the best humor: in the exposure of the grotesque as if it were vulgar.

I remember the day I decided to start these notes. Like all important decisions, this one came to me like a gust, seizing my mind and forcing immediate action. In the next instant, the thought of what to write. The consensus: start with the acknowledgments. So I wrote about Nelson, Dostoevsky, Swift, Pondé and a few others, and it was not a week from the decision to the publication of the first notes. Fair enough. To the initiate, I see no reasonable posture other than that of humility; it is necessary to be accountable to those who contributed in some way to his initiation. Gratitude is a noble and profitable exercise, recognition is a requirement of character. I say this to conclude: the faculty of gratitude seems to me a good parameter to distinguish the one who, by voluntary effort, strives to be greater than his vanity.